Fit before start
Technical interviews and trial tasks aligned to your stack and culture.
- Stack match
- Trial sprint
- References
- Timezone
Capacity on demand
Staff augmentation fails when vendors run a shadow process. Our people join your rituals, your review standards, and your definition of done. If the fit is off, we fix it fast.
How we embed
Augmentation works when skills, timezone overlap, and communication norms are explicit.
Technical interviews and trial tasks aligned to your stack and culture.
Slack, Jira, repos, and ceremonies from day one-not parallel processes.
Sprint commitments, code review standards, and escalation paths.
Knowledge transfer and pairing so dependency on us shrinks over time.
Engagement value
Augmentation buys speed and skills while keeping the steering wheel with your leads. These are the levers clients hire us for.
Roles we embed
Match the gap in your sprint. Not a generic outsourcing catalogue rehashing other service pages.
Outcome 01
API design, data modelling, and observability. Embedded engineers who respect your ADRs and on-call rotation.
Outcome 02
Component libraries, performance budgets, and store releases. Paired with your designers and QA, not throwing code over a wall.
Outcome 03
Regression suites and release certification inside your CI. Test debt reduced while feature teams keep shipping.
Outcome 04
Pipeline hardening, incident response pairing, and IaC reviews. Your platform team keeps ownership; we add capacity where needed.
Fit matters
We have joined regulated fintech squads, agency-style marketing tech teams, and zero-to-one startups with no PM layer.
01
Async updates and PR descriptions are reviewed before client interviews. Quiet geniuses who cannot communicate are filtered early.
02
Minimum hours overlapping your stand-up window are contractual. Not "we will try" timezone math.
03
When contracts end, knowledge transfer sessions are scheduled. Bus factor does not spike because our contract expired.
04
Staff engineer vs. mid-level is stated plainly. No inflation that wastes your interview panel's time.
Staffing outcomes
5 days
Median start after profile approval
92%
Engagements extended past pilot
18
Stacks staffed in the last year
Staffing flow
Four steps with explicit gates. You approve profiles before start dates, not after disappointment sets in.
Step01
We clarify seniority, stack, timezone overlap, and success metrics. Profiles match the ticket backlog, not a generic "full stack" label.


Step02
You interview finalists who have shipped in similar domains. Technical and communication bar agreed before anyone starts.
Step03
Access, branch strategy, and first PR scoped small. Engineers earn trust on code review before touching critical paths.


Step04
Fortnightly check-ins with your lead and our delivery manager. Adjust headcount or skills before drift becomes frustration.
Case studies
FAQ
You retain product ownership and architecture authority. We supply individuals or squads who execute your backlog under your leads, not a parallel PM layer.
Replacement within the notice window. We treat mismatches as our problem to solve quickly, not yours to endure through a long contract.
Yes. They follow your onboarding, laptop policy, and compliance training like any contractor joining the org.
UX/UI, product owners, and scrum support are available. Scoped with the same embedding expectations as engineering.
Standard NDAs and work-for-hire terms. Code commits under your org accounts where policy requires it.
Get in touch
Role, seniority, stack, duration, and timezone. We will send profiles or tell you honestly if the market timing is tight.